補充主題:How Could We Release the Tension between Science and Philosophy? Or, How Necessary is It?
Published by Frank C.S. Liu,
政治科學與哲學之間的辯論並非不重要,但在本課程中已不再是主要課題,主要考量是這樣的辯論只是實況的再現,不見得能達致調和、合作的效果。最重要的,是過去十年來,我們並未見到具體的、哲學與科學攜手打造出的,讓整個學門振奮的研究成果。因此,我選擇將此議題庫存起來,在此提供給同學作為補充,期待日後有更精采的文章可以討論。
-
- Lawson, S. (2008). Political studies and the contextual turn: A methodological/normative critique. Political Studies, 56 (3), 584-603.
Download PDF - McCormick, J. P. (2000). Political science and political philosophy: Return to the classics - No, not those! Ps-Political Science & Politics, 33 (2), 195-197.
Download PDF - Mayhew, D. R. (2000). Political science and political philosophy: Ontological not normative. Ps-Political Science & Politics, 33 (2), 192-193.
Download PDF - Smith, S. B. (2000). Political science and political philosophy: An uneasy relation. Ps-Political Science & Politics, 33 (2) , 189-191.
Download PDF - White, S. K. (2000). Taking ontology seriously in political science and political theory: A reply to Mayhew. Ps-Political Science & Politics, 33 (4), 743-744.
Download PDF
- Lawson, S. (2008). Political studies and the contextual turn: A methodological/normative critique. Political Studies, 56 (3), 584-603.